Quorum Forum Podcast Ep. 107: 2026 APA-CMS Bar Exam
Ancel Glink's Quorum Forum Podcast released Episode 107: 2026 APA-CMS Bar Exam. In this episode, the American Planning Association Chicago Metro Section recently teamed up with Ancel Glink’s Quorum Forum podcast for the 11th Annual “Bar Exam” Planning Law Session. Recorded live at Goodwin’s in Chicago, this realistic, simulated law school experience tests planners and land use professionals on the latest legal precedents in wind energy, annexation, and First Amendment protections. As is tradition, all participants passed the bar, and teams competed for the prestigious (and five-foot-tall) Ancel Glink Cup. In this episode, Ancel Glink’s Dan Bolin, Megan Mack, and Tyler Smith are joined by special guest Phil Green, a Local Gov 250 Government Champion, who undergoes a high-tech “firmware update” to become the session’s first AI-powered planning law assistant.
In This Episode
§
[00:00]
The Roll Call: Host
Dan Bolin calls the meeting to order with professors Megan Mack and Tyler
Smith, plus local government champion Phil Green.
§
[05:00]
Round 1: Democracy at the Doorstep: Phil discusses his recognition as a Local Gov 250
Champion and his work on “democracy at the doorstep” in Hoffman Estates.
§
[11:30]
Case 1.1 - Wind Farm Bans: A
look at Hickory Wind LLC v. Village of Cedar Point, exploring why
outright bans on lawful land uses exceed non-home rule authority.
§
[19:00]
Case 1.2 - Zoning Finality: In Chosen
Consulting LLC v. Town Council of Highland, we learn why ADA and
discrimination claims do not bypass the requirement for a final zoning
decision.
§
[22:30]
Case 1.3 - Cross-Examination Rights: A resort project in Galena highlights the importance of
maintaining a record when residents forfeit their right to cross-examine
witnesses.
§
[26:30]
Round 2: The Road to Houston: Phil shares takeaways from serving as the Education
Chair for NPC26 in Detroit and teases a “Moon Joy” theme for NPC27 in
Houston.
§
[31:45]
Case 2.1 - Forceful Annexation: We review a 4.7% perimeter gap in Husky
Transportation v. Village of Barrington Hills to define the “wholly
bounded” standard.
§
[35:45]
Case 2.2 - First Amendment Retaliation: The saga of the Minocqua Brewing Co. demonstrates
that permit denials are not retaliatory if they would have occurred regardless
of protected speech.
§
[39:15]
Case 2.3 - The Hamburger UFOs: A whimsical mural case from Kansas tests “intermediate
scrutiny” and whether cities can prove that burger art is more distracting than
flower art.
§ [42:00] The Future of Planning Law: Megan and Tyler discuss
the responsible use of AI in legal practice and how municipalities
are responding to data center controversies involving power and water
consumption.
§ [46:15] The Reveal of A.I. CPU: Phil Green manifests as the A.I.
CPU, an assistant that is 100% confident, 60% accurate, and requires massive
amounts of “liquid cooling” to function.
§ [48:00] Round 3: AI-Assisted Answers: The A.I. CPU helps navigate cases on
warrantless rental inspections, daily fine calculations, and why missing
scaffolding is not a legal defense for safety hazards.
§ [1:02:30] Crowning the Champions: We announce the winners of the 2026 Bar
Exam and award the shiny gold Ancel Glink Cup to the “Transit Masters.”

0 comments:
Post a Comment