Updates on cases, laws, and other topics of interest to local governments

Subscribe by Email

Enter your Email:
Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a Reader

Follow Municipal Minute on Twitter


Blog comments do not reflect the views or opinions of the Author or Ancel Glink. Some of the content may be considered attorney advertising material under the applicable rules of certain states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please read our full disclaimer

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Nothing New in 3rd PAC Opinion of 2016

I got a little excited when I checked the Attorney General's website and saw a new binding opinion - it's been 6 weeks since we have seen any action out of the PAC office, so I was looking forward to reading what new guidance the PAC is providing local governments.  Unfortunately, there is nothing novel or new about the 3rd binding opinion of 2016. Once again, the PAC took the easy road and issued a binding opinion to find a public body in violation of FOIA for not responding to a FOIA request.

In PAC Op. 16-003, a requester filed a FOIA request with a school district asking for various emails and text messages of certain district employees, as well as employment interview records. The district responded that it would be extending the time frame for an additional 5 days. However, when the requester had not received the records 4 weeks later, she filed an appeal with the PAC. The PAC found the district in violation for (1) not extending the time period for response properly; (2) improperly calculating the time for response with the extension; and (3) not providing the documents to the requester.

So, the lesson from this PAC opinion?  You have to respond to FOIA requests.  

Nothing new here. 

Post Authored by Julie Tappendorf


Post a Comment