Updates on cases, laws, and other topics of interest to local governments

Subscribe by Email

Enter your Email:
Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a Reader

Follow Municipal Minute on Twitter

Disclaimer

Blog comments do not reflect the views or opinions of the Author or Ancel Glink. Some of the content may be considered attorney advertising material under the applicable rules of certain states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please read our full disclaimer

Friday, January 5, 2024

Court Dismisses Cyclist’s Lawsuit Against City


The Illinois Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of a city in a lawsuit brought by a cyclist against the city, finding the city immune from liability under the Tort Immunity Act. Alave v. The City of Chicago.  

A cyclist was injured after striking a pothole while riding his bike along a city roadway. The road had no designated bike lane, but a bike rental station was located close to the site of the cyclist’s accident. The cyclist sued the city arguing that the city was liable for his injuries because cyclists were permitted and intended users of city roads. The trial court ruled in favor of the city finding that cyclists were not permitted and intended users of the road where the accident occurred. On appeal, the appellate court reversed the trial court and held that cyclists were permitted and intended users of the road because of the city’s placement of a bike rental station along the roadway.   

On appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court, the cyclist argued that the city’s placement of a bike rental station along the roadway and city ordinances prohibiting cyclists from riding bikes on city sidewalks made cyclists permitted and intended users of the road where the accident occurred. The city argued that cyclists were not permitted and intended users of the road where the accident occurred because the road was not a designated bike lane. 

After reviewing the city ordinances governing bicycle use along sidewalks and roads, the placement of a bike rental station along the road where the accident occurred, and the lack of signs designating the road as a bike lane, the Illinois Supreme Court held that cyclists were not intended users of the road. For a municipality to be liable for cyclists’ injuries, there must be other objective manifestations of the city’s intent that cyclists are intended users of a road than the placement of a bike rental station. Because cyclists were not intended users of the road at issue in the case, the Court held that the city was not liable for the cyclist’s injuries. 

Post Authored by Tyler Smith, Ancel Glink

0 comments:

Post a Comment