Updates on cases, laws, and other topics of interest to local governments

Subscribe by Email

Enter your Email:
Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a Reader

Follow Municipal Minute on Twitter


Blog comments do not reflect the views or opinions of the Author or Ancel Glink. Some of the content may be considered attorney advertising material under the applicable rules of certain states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please read our full disclaimer

Thursday, June 10, 2021

Court Dismisses Case Against PAC in FOIA Appeal

in 2017 and 2018, a FOIA requestor submitted seven FOIA requests to three different public bodies. After the public bodies denied each request based on applicable FOIA exemptions, the requestor appealed each denial to the Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor (PAC). The PAC notified the requestor that no further action would be taken in response to his appeals. The requestor then filed a lawsuit against the PAC, alleging it violated FOIA by refusing to perform “a clear ministerial duty” by denying his requests for review.  

The trial court ruled in favor of the PAC and dismissed the requester's lawsuit holding that it lacked jurisdiction to review the PAC’s decision because the PAC did not issue a binding opinion in response to any of the requester's appeals. The requester appealed.

In Shehadeh v. Raoul, the appellate court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of the requestor’s complaint. The appellate court ruled that a courts cannot review a PAC decision to not issue a binding opinion, because a PAC decision to resolve a request for review by issuing an advisory rather than a binding opinion is entirely discretionary and, therefore, not subject to review by the courts.

Post Authored by Eugene Bolotnikov, Ancel Glink


Post a Comment