Supreme Court Addresses "Knock and Talk" Exception to 4th Amendment
Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed
in on the “knock and talk” police procedure that provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
Specifically, the Court determined that there is no established rule in
place that restricts police to approach only the front door of a private home
when investigating a possible crime. The
case is Carroll v. Carmon (Nov. 10, 2014), which reached the Supreme Court by way of the 3rd
Circuit Court of Appeals.
Two Pennsylvania state troopers had gone to the Carman’s
home after receiving a tip that a man, who allegedly had stolen a car and two
loaded handguns, was at that home. The officers parked their car at the
side of the house, and noticed that there was a back door, opening onto a rear
porch. Officer Carroll would say later that he thought that “looked like
a customary entryway,” so the two officers approached that door. With Mrs. Carman’s permission, the two
officers searched the house, but did not find the suspect. The troopers then
left, and the Carmans sued, claiming a violation of their privacy because the
police approached the back door, instead of the front door. The 3rd Circuit ruled in their
favor, finding that the so-called “knock and talk” exception to the Fourth
Amendment privacy guarantee “requires that police officers begin their
encounter at the front door, where they have an implied invitation to go.”
Post Authored by Julie Tappendorf
This is a good article on knock and talk intrusions. There was a similar case in Utah recently.
ReplyDeletehttp://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2016/06/the-supreme-courts-utah-v-strieff-decision-and-the-fourth-amendment/