Thursday, March 23, 2017
Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Wednesday, March 22, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
Tuesday, March 21, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Monday, March 20, 2017
Monday, March 20, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
According to the written order, Judge Ellis expressed her doubts concerning the ability of the plaintiffs to show how the ordinance violates their constitutional rights or how they would suffer irreparable harm if the new rules take effect. Specifically, the Judge held that plaintiffs were not likely to establish that the City's shared housing ordinance targets expressive conduct or speech to trigger First Amendment protections. She also questioned plaintiffs' ability to succeed on its due process claims that the ordinance is vague. Finally, she noted that the City had a legitimate interest in adopting rules for the home sharing industry to address issues such as ensuring safety, protecting the residential character of neighborhoods, among others.
Post Authored by Julie Tappendorf
Friday, March 17, 2017
Friday, March 17, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
- Municipal annexation powers;
- Urban agricultural zones;
- Regional storm water management;
- Rehabilitation and revitalization tax credits; and
- Small wireless facilities deployment on public rights of way and other properties.
- Raise awareness of legislative matters,
- Use data to better target legislative action messages to membership, and
- Educate membership on the importance of legislative advocacy, and
- Provide recommendations on how members can get more involved in a way that balances legislative advocacy and responsibilities to their communities.
Thursday, March 16, 2017
Thursday, March 16, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
Wednesday, March 15, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
“…all legislative, executive, administrative or advisory bodies of the State, counties, townships, cities, villages, incorporated towns, school districts and all other municipal corporations, boards, bureaus, committees or commissions of this State, and any subsidiary bodies of any of the foregoing including but not limited to committees and subcommittees which are supported in whole or in part by tax revenue, or which expend tax revenue, except the General Assembly and committees or commissions thereof. "Public body" includes tourism boards and convention or civic center boards located in counties that are contiguous to the Mississippi River with populations of more than 250,000 but less than 300,000. "Public body" includes the Health Facilities and Services Review Board. "Public body" does not include a child death review team or the Illinois Child Death Review Teams Executive Council established under the Child Death Review Team Act, an ethics commission acting under the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act, a regional youth advisory board or the Statewide Youth Advisory Board established under the Department of Children and Family Services Statewide Youth Advisory Board Act, or the Illinois Independent Tax Tribunal.” 5 ILCS 120/1.02.
Monday, March 13, 2017
Monday, March 13, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
- the request was made for a commercial purpose;
- the request is made by the same person for the same records previously provided; and
- the request is made less than 6 months after the previous request.
Repeated requests from the same person for the same records that are unchanged or identical to records previously provided or properly denied under this Act shall be deemed unduly burdensome under this provision.We will keep you posted on this bill.
Post authored by Julie Tappendorf
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Wednesday, March 08, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Monday, March 6, 2017
Monday, March 06, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Friday, March 3, 2017
Friday, March 03, 2017 Julie Tappendorf
Thursday, March 2, 2017
Thursday, March 02, 2017 Julie Tappendorf